af Michael Shermer
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, I filmed a television show with Bill Nye in Seattle, Washington, for a new PBS science series entitled "Eye on Nye." This series is an adult-oriented version of Bill’s wildly successful 100-episode children’s series "Bill Nye the Science Guy." This 30-minute segment was on psychics and talking to the dead. Although I have analyzed the process and written about it extensively, I have had very little experience in actually doing psychic readings. Bill and I thought it would be a good test of the effectiveness of the technique and the receptivity of people to it to see how well I could do it armed with just a little knowledge.
Although the day of the taping was set weeks in advance, I did absolutely nothing to prepare until the day before. This made me especially nervous because psychic readings are a form of acting, and good acting takes talent and practice. And I made matters even harder on myself by convincing Bill and the producers that if we were going to do this we should use a number of different psychic modalities, including Tarot cards, palm reading, astrology, and psychic mediumship, under the theory that these are all "props" used to stage a psychodrama called cold reading (reading someone "cold" without any prior knowledge). I am convinced more than ever that cheating (getting information ahead of time on subjects) is not a necessary part of a successful reading.
I read five different people, all women that the production staff had selected and about whom I was told absolutely nothing. I had no contact with any of the subjects until they sat down in front of me for the taping. The setting was a sound stage at KCTS, the PBS affiliate station in Seattle. Since sound stages can have a rather cold feel to them, and because the set-up for a successful psychic reading is vital to generate receptivity in subjects, I instructed the production staff to set up two comfortable chairs with a small table between them, with a lace cloth covering the table and candles on and around the table, all sitting on a beautiful Persian rug. Soft colored lighting and incense provided a "spiritual" backdrop.
The Partial Facts of Cold Reading
My primary source for all of the readings was Ian Rowland’s insightful and encyclopedic The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading (now in a 3rd edition available at www.ian-rowland.com). Rowland stresses the importance of the pre-reading set-up to prime the subject into being sympathetic to the cold reading. He suggests—and I took him up on these suggestions—adopting a soft voice, a calm demeanor, and sympathetic and non-confrontational body language: a pleasant smile, constant eye contact, head tilted to one side while listening, and facing the subject with legs together (not crossed) and arms unfolded. I opened each reading by introducing myself as Michael from Hollywood, calling myself a “Psychic Intuitor.” I explained that my “clients” come to see me about various things that might be weighing heavy on their hearts (the heart being the preferred organ of new age nonsense), and that as an intuitor it was my job to use my special gift of intuition—a gift, I added, that everyone has but that I have just developed through practice—to help them find their way through the vagaries of life. I said that we would start general and then get more focused, beginning with the present then glancing back to the past, and finally taking a glimpse of the future.
I also noted that we psychics cannot predict the future perfectly, thereby setting up the pre-emptive excuse for later misses—by explaining how we look for general trends and “inclinations” (an astrological buzz word). I built on the disclaimer by adding a touch of self-effacing humor meant also to initiate a bond between us: “While it would be wonderful if I was a hundred percent accurate, you know, no one is perfect. After all, if I could psychically divine the numbers to next week’s winning lottery I would keep them for myself!” Finally, I explained that there are many forms of psychic readings, including Tarot Cards, Palm Reading, Astrology, and the like, and that my specialty was…whatever modality I was about to do with that particular subject.
I began with what Rowland calls the "Rainbow Ruse" and "Fine Flattery," and what other mentalists more generally call a Barnum reading (offering something for everyone, as P.T. always did). The components of the following reading come from various sources, the particular sequential arrangement is my own. Essentially I opened all of my readings with this general statement: You can be a very considerate person, very quick to provide for others, but there are times, if you are honest, when you recognize a selfish streak in yourself. I would say that on the whole you can be rather quiet, self-effacing type, but when the circumstances are right, you can be quite the life of the party if the mood strikes you.
Sometimes you are too honest about your feelings and you reveal too much of yourself. You are good at thinking things through and you like to see proof before you change your mind about anything. When you find yourself in a new situation you are very cautious until you find out what’s going on, and then you begin to act with confidence. What I get here is that you are someone who can generally be trusted. Not a saint, not perfect, but let’s just say that when it really matters this is someone who does understand the importance of being trustworthy. You know how to be a good friend.
You are able to discipline yourself so that you seem in control to others, but actually you sometimes feel somewhat insecure. You wish you could be a little more popular and at ease in your interpersonal relationships than you are now.
You are wise in the ways of the world, a wisdom gained through hard experience rather than book learning.
According to Rowland–and he was spot on with this one—the statement “You are wise in the ways of the world, a wisdom gained through hard experience rather than book learning” was flattery gold. Every one of my subjects nodded furiously in agreement and said that this statement really summed them up to a tee.
After the general statement and personality assessment, I went for specific comments lifted straight from Rowland’s list of high probability guesses.
These include items found in the subject’s home:
- A box of old photographs, some in albums, most not in albums
- Old medicine or medical supplies out of date
- Toys, books, mementoes from childhood
- Jewelry from a deceased family member
- Pack of cards, maybe a card missing
- Electronic gizmo or gadget that no longer works
- Notepad or message board with missing matching pen
- Out of date note on fridge or near the phone
- Books about a hobby no longer pursued
- Out of date calendar
- Drawer that is stuck or doesn’t slide properly
- Keys that you can’t remember what they go to
- Watch or clock that no longer works
And peculiarities about the person:
- Scar on knee
- Number 2 in the home address
- Childhood accident involving water
- Clothing never worn
- Photos of loved ones in purse
- Wore hair long as a child, then shorter haircut
- One earring with a missing match
I added one of my own to great effect: "I see a white car." All of my subjects were able to find a meaningful connection to a white car. As I was reading this list on the flight to Seattle the morning of the reading, I was amazed to discover how many flight attendants and people around me validated them.
Finally, Rowland reminds his ersatz psychics that if the set-up is done properly people are only too willing to offer information, especially if you ask the right questions. Here are a few winners:
"Tell me, are you currently in a long-term relationship, or not?"
"Are you satisfied in terms of your career, or is there a problem?"
"What is it about your health that concerns you?"
"Who is the person who has passed over that you want to try to contact today?"
While going through the Barnum reading I remembered to pepper the commentary with what Rowland calls "incidental questions," such as:
"…now why would that be?"
"…is this making sense to you?"
"…does this sound right?"
"…would you say this is along the right lines for you?"
"…this is significant to you, isn’t it?"
"…you can connect with this can’t you?"
"…so who might this refer to please?"
"…what might this link to in your life?"
"…what period of your life, please, might this relate to?"
"…so tell me, how might this be significant to you?"
"…can you see why this might be the impression I’m getting?"
With this background, all gleaned from a single day of intense reading and note taking, I was set.
The Tarot Card reading
My first subject was Micael, age 21, for whom I was to do a Tarot card reading. To prepare myself I bought a "Haindl Tarot Deck," created by Hermann Haindl and produced by U.S. Games Systems in Stamford, Connecticut ($16.00), and read through the little pamphlet that comes with it. It is a beautiful deck of cards, with elegant illustrations on them, each one replete with an astrological symbol, a Rune sign, a Hebrew letter, I Ching symbols, and lots of mythic characters from history.
At a total of 78 cards there was no way I was going to memorize all the "real" meanings and symbols, so the night before I sat down with my family and read through the instruction manual and we did a reading together, going through what each of the 10 cards we used is suppose to mean. My 11-year old daughter Devin then quizzed me on them until I had them down cold. I used what is called the "Hagall Spread" (no explanation given as to who or what a Hagall is), where you initially lay out four cards in a diamond shape, then put three cards on top and three more on the bottom.
By the time of the reading I forgot what the layout meant, so I made up a story about how the center four cards represent the present, the top three cards represent the future, and the bottom three cards are the characters that are going to help you get to that future. It turns out that it doesn’t matter what story you make up, as long as it sounds convincing. I was glad, however, that I had memorized the meanings of the symbols and characters on the cards I used because Micael had previously done Tarot card reading herself.
Since Micael was my first reading I was a little stiff and nervous, so I did not stray far from the standard Barnum reading, worked my way through the Big Five personality traits fairly successfully, and did not hazard any of the high probability guesses. Since she was a student I figured she was indecisive about her life, so I offered lots of trite generalities that would have applied to almost anyone: she is uncertain about her future but exited about the possibilities, she is confident in her talents yet still harbors some insecurities, travel is in her immediate future, she strikes a healthy balance between head and heart, intellect and intuition, and so forth Tarot cards are a great gimmick because they provide the cold reader with a prop to lean on, something to reference and point to, something for the subject to ask about. I purposely put the “Death” card in the spread because that one seems to make people anxious. This gave me an opportunity to pontificate about the meaning of life and death, that the card actually represents not physical death but metaphorical death, transitions in life are a time of opportunity—the “death” of a career and the “rebirth” of another career—and other such dribble. The line was cast, the bait set, and the fish bit.
After each reading the producers conducted a short taped interview with the subject, asking them how they thought the reading went. Micael said she thought the reading went well, that I accurately summarized her life and personality, but that there were no surprises, nothing that struck her as startling. She had experienced psychic readings before and that mine was fairly typical. I felt that the reading was mediocre at best. I was just getting started.
The Palm Reading
My second reading was on Brittany, age 19. Palm reading is the best of the psychic props because, as in the Tarot cards, there is something specific to reference, but it has the added advantage of making physical contact with the subject. I could not remember what all the lines on a palm are suppose to represent, so while I was memorizing the Tarot cards Devin did a google image search for me and downloaded this palm chart.
I mainly focused on the Life, Head, Heart, and Health lines, and for added effect added some blather about the Marriage, Money, and Fate lines. Useful nonsense includes:
- If the Head and Life lines are connected it means that there was an early dependence on family.
- If Head and Life lines are not connected it means the client has declared independence early.
- The degree of separation between the Head and Heart lines indicates the degree of dependence or independence between the head and the heart for making decisions.
- The strength of the Head line indicates the thinking style—intuitive or rational.
- Breaks in the Head line may mean there was a head injury, or that the subject gets headaches, or something happened to the head at some time in the subject’s life.
On one web page I downloaded some material about the angles of the thumbs to the hand that was quite useful. You have the subject rest both hands palm down on the table, and then observe whether they are relaxed or tight and whether the fingers are close together or spread apart. This purportedly indicates how uptight or relaxed someone is, how extroverted or introverted they are, how confident or insecure they feel, etc. According to one palm reader a small thumb angle "reveals that you are a person who does not rush into doing things. You are cautious and wisely observe the situation before taking action. You are not pushy about getting your way." A medium thumb angle "reveals that you do things both for yourself and for others willingly. You are not overly mental about what you are going to do, so you don’t waste a lot of time doing unnecessary planning for each job." And a big thumb angle "reveals that you are eager to jump in and get things done right away. You do things quickly, confidently, and pleasurably because you like to take charge and get the job done." Conveniently, you can successfully use any of these descriptions with anyone.
It turns out that you can tell the handedness of a person because the dominant hand is a little larger and more muscular. That gave me an opening to tell Brittany, who was left-handed, that she was right-brain dominant, which means that she puts more emphasis on intuition than on intellect, that she is herself very intuitive (Rowland says that a great ruse is to flatter the subjects with praise about their own psychic powers), and that her wisdom comes more from real world experience than traditional book learning. She nodded furiously in agreement.
According to the various palm reading "experts," you are suppose to comment on the color and texture of the skin, hair on the back of the palm, and general shape of the hands. Any major discrepancy between the two hands is supposed to be a sign of areas where subjects have departed from their inherited potential. The psychic should also take note of the shape of the fingers. The outer phalanges of the fingers (the finger tips) represent spiritual or idealistic aspects of the person, the middle phalanges everyday and practical aspects, and the lower phalanges the emotional aspects of personality. I found it most effective to rub my fingers over the mounds of flesh on each finger segment while commenting on Brittany’s personality.
For this reading I threw in a few high probability guesses, starting with the white car. It turns out that Brittany’s 99-year old grandmother had a white car, which gave me an opening to comment about the special nature of her relationship with her grandmother, which was spot on. Then I tried the out of date calendar, which did not draw an affirmative response from my mark, so I recovered by backing off toward a more general comment: "Well…what I’m getting here is something about a transition from one period in your life to another," which elicited a positive affirmation from Brittany that she was thinking of switching majors.
Brittany’s assessment of my reading was slightly more positive than Micael’s, as was my own self-evaluation, but no one was yet floored by anything said. I was still gathering steam for the big push to come.
The Astrological Reading
JoAnn, age 20, was my toughest read of the day. She gave monosyllabic answers to my incidental questions for extracting information, and did not seem to have much going on in her life that required much in the way of psychic advice. The astrological chart below I downloaded from the Internet. It was constructed some time ago for a guy named John, born May 9, 1961. JoAnn was born September 3, 1982. I haven’t got a clue what the chart means. Of course, since it doesn’t actually mean anything, I began by explaining that "the stars incline but do not compel," and then I just made up a bunch of stuff about how the conjunction of having a rising moon in the third house and a setting sun in the fifth house is an indication that she has a bright future ahead of her, and that her personality is a healthy balance between head and heart, mind and spirit, intellect and intuition. Her nods indicated agreement.
I threw out a bunch of high probability guesses and got about half of them right (including the line about wearing her hair longer at a younger age), then closed the reading by asking her if she had any questions for me. She said that she had applied for a scholarship in order to participate in a foreign student exchange program in England, and wanted to know if she was going to get it. I responded that the important issue at hand was not whether she was going to get the scholarship or not, but how she would deal with whether she got it or not, and that I perceived that her healthy and balanced personality would allow her to handle whatever the outcome. This seemed to go over well. In the post-reading interview she was much more positive than I anticipated, considering how stilted the reading was, so I suppose we can count this one as a success as well, although I was not particularly proud of it.
Olivia, age 58, was my fourth subject, for which I was to do a straight cold read with no props. I began with the Barnum reading, but did not get far into it before it became apparent that she was more than a little willing to talk about her problems. She did not want to hear all that generic crap. She wanted to get straight to the specific issues on her mind that day. Since she was overweight and did not look particularly healthy, but I didn’t want to say anything about her weight, I said I was picking up something about her being concerned about her health and diet, guessing, since this was still early January, that she probably made a New Year’s resolution about losing weight and starting a new exercise program. Bingo!
Olivia then opened up about her recent back surgery and other bodily ailments. I tried a number of high probability guesses that worked quite well, especially the box of photographs, broken gadgets around the house, and the short hair/long hair line, all hits, especially the hair, which she explained she changes constantly. I said I was getting something about a scar or scrape on her knees, and that left her slack jawed. She said that she had not scraped her knees since childhood, but had just the week before fallen down and tore them up pretty badly. Swish!
Although I was able to glean from the conversation that she had recently lost her mother, and a few minutes of generic comments from me about her mother staying close to her in her memory left her in tears, Olivia really came to find out about her son. What was he going to do? A minute of Q & A revealed that he is a senior in high school, so I assumed that as his mother she was worried about him going off to college. Nothing but net! What in particular was she worried about? He was thinking of going to USC, so I jumped in before she could explain, and surmised that it was because the University of Southern California is located in downtown Los Angeles, not exactly the safest neighborhood in the area.
In the post-reading interview Olivia praised my psychic intuition to the hilt and Bill and his producers were beside themselves with glee at what great dramatic television this was going to make. Imagine how John Edwards’ producers must feel after a taping of Crossing Over. (On a positive note we did learn that day that James Van Praagh’s television series was just cancelled due to poor ratings.)
Talking to the Dead
Melanie, age 50, was my last subject—and my best reading. She had told Bill’s producer that she had something very specific she wanted to talk about, but did not offer a clue as to what it was. It didn’t take me long to find out. When I introduced myself and shook her hand, I noticed that her hands were exceptionally muscular and her palms sweaty. This was a high-strung, nervous person who was obviously emotional and agitated. I assumed that someone near to her had died (the proper phrase is "passed into spirit"), and that she wanted to make contact. "I’m sensing several people that have passed over, either parents or a parent-like figure to you." It was her father who died, and she clearly had unfinished business with him.
From the ensuing conversation I discovered that her father had died when she was 27, so I deduced that it must have been a sudden death (correct) and that she did not have the opportunity to make her peace with him (also correct). Finally, I accurately deduced that she was sad because she would have liked to share her many life experiences over the past two decades with her father—”such as having a child.” Wrong—Melanie is childless. Without missing a beat I offered this riposte: “Oh, what I mean is giving birth to a new idea or new business.” A three-pointer from downtown! This was an entrepreneurial woman whose father was a successful businessman with whom she would have loved to share the success.
It wasn’t long before Melanie was nearly sobbing. This was an emotionally fragile woman of whom I could have easily taken advantage by jumped in with some inane line such as "your father is here with us now and he wants you to know that he loves you." But I knew I would have to look in the mirror the next morning and just couldn’t do it, even for a worthwhile exposé of a very evil practice. Instead I said "your father would want you to keep him in your heart and your memories, but that it is time now to move on." I wanted to give her something specific, as well as lighten up the reading because it was getting pretty glum, so I said "and it’s okay to throw away all those boxes of his stuff that you have been keeping but want to get rid of." She burst out laughing and confessed that she had a garage full of her father’s belongings that she had long wanted to dispose of but was feeling guilty about doing so. This exchange was, I hoped, a moral message that violated no trust on my part and still had the desired effect for our show.
In the post-reading interview Melanie said that she had been going to psychics for over ten years trying to resolve this business with her father, and that mine was the single best reading she had ever had.
Wow! That made my psychic day.
I can only imagine what I could do with more experience. Give me six hours of day of practice for a couple of months and I have no doubt that I could host a successful syndicated television series and increase by orders of magnitude my bank balance. There—if not for the grace of evolved moral sentiments and guilt-laden scruples—go I. I cannot do this for one simple reason—it is wrong. I have lost both of my parents—my father suddenly of a heart attack in 1986, my mother slowly from brain cancer in 2000—and I cannot imagine anything more insulting to the dead, and more insidious to the living, than constructing a fantasy that they are hovering nearby in the psychic aether. This is worse than wrong. It is wanton depravity.
Kilde: From E-SKEPTIC FOR JANUARY 20, 2003. Copyright 2003 Michael Shermer, Skeptics Society, Skeptic magazine. Permission to print, distribute, and post with proper citation and acknowledgment. Subscribe to e-Skeptic for free by sending an e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org